Consultant’s unnecessary lies result in unnecessary denial and fraud waiver

Consultant’s unnecessary lies result in unnecessary denial and fraud waiver

Recently, a person came to my office for consultation after her adjustment of status application (based on marriage to a US citizen) was denied due to fraud. She had entered the US on a transit visa (C-1), but was not a crewman. Therefore, she was otherwise eligible to adjust status.

The problem is she went to a consultant for legal assistance in filling out her paperwork. The consultant filled out her forms, stating she had entered the US as a “visitor” on a B-2 visa, rather than as a transit. He included a doctored\altered I-94 (arrival/departure record), also indicating she entered the US as a visitor. The consultant probably did this because ordinarily, crewman on C-1 visas cannot adjust status in the US unless they have the benefit of Section 245(i). So, the consultant sought to cover-up, or alter her manner of entry. But the “lie” was unnecessary, and caused unnecessary problems.

At her adjustment interview, the immigration officer already had records of her having entered the US on a C-1 visa, not as a B-2 visitor.  When the officer saw that her forms and paperwork indicated she entered as a visitor, he considered this to be fraud, making her ineligible to adjust status. However, she was completely unaware that the consultant had filled out the paperwork this way, and was unaware that the consultant had put down incorrect information on her forms. But still, she was held responsible for the consultant’s misrepresentations. (The law states a person is responsible for the misrepresentations of his or her “agent”).

My point is some people will go to consultants for assistance (because they believe the consultant is “cheaper,” or the person feels more comfortable with a consultant rather than an attorney).  But the person is completely unaware of what the consultant is doing, the information and documents the consultant is submitting, and the like. They trust the consultant, and sign the papers without reading or understanding them.

In this woman’s case, there was no reason to put down incorrect information.  But because the consultant did not know the law, he thought it would “help” her case by lying. The consultant probably was completely unaware that the immigration officers have access to a vast amount of information about people, including how and when they entered the US, any previous immigration filings, denials, removal proceedings, crimes, and the like. There are questions on the forms requiring a  “yes” or “no” answer about various subjects, and just because a person checks the “no” box, does not mean that the USCIS will believe them, and  move on.  The USCIS will investigate, check their data base, and will discover the truth, and your lies.

What makes matters worse is this person paid the consultant just about the same amount she would have paid an attorney. But now, she will have the extra expense of having to hire an attorney to undo the damage caused by the consultant. That is why it is important that if you have any immigration problem, go to an attorney, rather than a consultant. An attorney is licensed to practice law, can offer legal advice, and appear with you at your interview or hearing, to deal with any issues that may arise. A consultant cannot practice law, give legal advice, or represent you at interviews or hearings.

Follow us on and Twitter @GurfinkelLaw


Four offices to serve you:

8894-0258 or 8894-0239;

TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-866-GURFINKEL (1-866-487-3465)