HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 1996 IMMIGRATION LAW

by Michael J. Gurfinkel, Esq.

On September 30, 1996, President Clinton signed a new law affecting immigration, called the Illegal Immigration and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRAIRA). It revises, changes, eliminates, and expands existing immigration laws in numerous respects. The meaning and effect of many of the provisions of the new law are still subject to various interpretations and debate, as well as further changes, modifications, corrections, and the like from Congress, the INS, and the courts.

The following are highlights of some of the provisions of this new law.

1. Three-year and ten-year bars to admission/re-entry. Aliens unlawfully present in the U.S. for more than 180 days (approximately 6 months), but less than one year, and who "voluntarily departed" the U.S., are inadmissible to the U.S. (Meaning they cannot return to the U.S.) for three years from the date of their departure. An alien who had been unlawfully present for one year or more and "again seeks admission" to the U.S., is inadmissible for ten years from the date of their departure or removal.

Many people who are illegally in the U.S. are very concerned about this three/ten-year bar to admissibility. Does it mean that they can't get legalized for three or ten more years? The new law discusses this three/ten-year bar to admissibility in cases where an alien "voluntarily departed", or "who again seeks admission". Therefore, this law applies to situations where an alien had been unlawfully present in the U.S., and then, for some reason, left the U.S., and now seeks to come back again. However, if the alien does not leave the U.S., but instead continues to stay in the U.S., this three/ten-year bar to admissibility may not apply, since they did not "depart" the U.S., and are, therefore, not again seeking to be admitted to the U.S.

2. Expedited removal (deportation) of aliens who entered U.S. without inspection. Aliens who entered the U.S. without inspection (i.e. snuck across the border) who are in the U.S. less than two years, can be removed (deported) from the U.S. without any further court hearing or review, unless they have a legitimate basis for applying for political asylum. Under existing law, there are numerous procedural safeguards to aliens who entered without inspection, such as court hearings, appeals, etc. The 1996 law would allow immigration officers, in may cases, to remove (deport) such people without further court hearing or review.

3. Suspension of deportation requires ten years of continuous physical presence in U.S. Under the new law, suspension of deportation is now called "cancellation of removal". The requirements for cancellation of removal include:

a. Continuous physical presence in the U.S. for not less than ten years (Under the old law, suspension of deportation required only seven years of physical presence).

b. The person has been of good moral character during that entire ten-year time period. (This is the same as existing requirements for suspension of deportation).

c. The person has not been convicted of certain offenses under immigration law. (This is the same as existing requirements for suspension of deportation.)

d. The alien establishes that removal (deportation) would result in "exceptional and extremely unusual hardship" to the alien's spouse, parent, or child, who is a citizen of the U.S., or a green card holder. (Under old law, the alien could show "extreme hardship" to themselves, or to a spouse, parent, or child who is a citizen or green card holder. Now, instead of being able to show "extreme hardship", it must be "exceptional and extremely unusual hardship". In addition, it does not matter if the alien will have personal hardship. What matters is hardship to certain family members only.

Also, computation of the period of continuous physical presence in the U.S. ends or stops when an alien is served with a Notice to Appear or Order to Show Cause. Under old law, if an alien had been served with an order to show cause before they met the seven years of continuous physical presence in the U.S., they could continue to count the time in the U.S. after having been served with an order to show cause towards meeting the seven-year requirement. For example, under the old law, if a person had been in the U.S. for six and a half years, and then had been placed in deportation proceedings, but the proceedings were delayed for six or more months, they could then add that additional six months to the time they have been in the U.S., which would then equal the seven years of continuous physical presence. Under the new law, people cannot count the time they are in the U.S. after they have been served with a notice to appear. So, if a person had not been in the U.S. for ten continuous years at the time they were served with a notice to appear, they would not be eligible for the new "cancellation of removal".

4. Strict enforcement of affidavits of support. The new law provides for strict requirements for affidavits of support. (In the past, many people (i.e. family members) would sign affidavits of support, but an alien, once in the U.S., would apply for public assistance, and nothing was done to the sponsor. Under the new law, the government can go after the sponsor to collect and/or be reimbursed for any public assistance received by the alien.) Among the new requirements are:

a. The affidavit of support must be signed as a legally binding "contract".

b. The sponsor (the person signing the affidavit of support) must provide support to the alien at an annual income that is not less than 125% of the Federal poverty line during the time in which the affidavit is enforceable.

c. Affidavits of support must be legally enforceable against the sponsor by the alien or the Federal, State, or local governmental agencies.

d. If the sponsored alien receives certain types of public assistance, the sponsor must reimburse the government for that public assistance. If the sponsor refuses to do so, the government can bring a lawsuit against the sponsor to enforce the affidavit of support, and collect from the sponsor.

e. In all cases, the petitioner must submit an affidavit of support even if there will be co-sponsors or if the person is poor, re tired, etc.

f. The petitioner must be domiciled or living in the U.S.

5. No "Consulate shopping" for visa overstays. If an alien enters the U.S. on a non-immigrant visa, remains in the U.S. beyond the period of authorized stay (the time specified on his I-94), and wants to obtain a new non-immigrant visa (as opposed to a permanent green card), he must go back to his home country to have that new non-immigrant visa issued. In the past, people typically entered on a visitor's visa, the visa expired, and they became TNT's. Later, they may have found an employer to petition them for a temporary working visa (H-1B), or a school, so they could get a student visa (F-1). Since they had been out of status, they were required to exit the U.S. and have the visa issued at a nearby Consulate. Many people went to U.S. Consulates in Mexico or Canada in order to have that H-1B or F-1 visa issued.

Under the old law, if you have been in the U.S. illegally for only a few months, nearby consulates have the discretion to entertain you and grant you a visa. The new law now requires Filipino TNT's to go back to Manila, and other aliens to their home country, for issuance of that new non-immigrant visa, even if you overstayed only one day.

CONCLUSION

There are many people who are still illegally in the U.S., and have still done nothing to legalize their status. Many have the attitude that if they wait long enough, the laws will get better. I think that they are fooling only themselves. While there is no reason to "panic", there definitely is reason for people in illegal status to do something to finally legalize their status. The various changes to immigration laws are only making it tougher to legalize. If you wait, it may be too late!

My advice is to seek the assistance of a reputable attorney, who can assist you in legalizing your status and help you realize your dreams in this Land of Opportunity.

 



Back to Main

 
 


© 2000-2007 The Law Offices of Michael J. Gurfinkel. All rights reserved.
To properly view this site, you must have the latest Flash plug-in. Site design by GALAM arts.