|
THE EMBASSY IS AWARE OF “ADOPTION FRAUD”
By Michael J. Gurfinkel, Esq.
Dear Attorney
Gurfinkel:
My
husband and I are U.S. citizens, and have been trying to have a child
for several years now. My unmarried niece in the Philippines is pregnant,
and is about to give birth. She is very poor and cannot afford
to raise the child. I know that I will be able to provide a good
life for her child. I was thinking of flying to the Philippines
when the child is about to be born, and have the child's birth certificate
registered, showing me as the natural mother.
My
husband and I would then apply either for a U.S. passport for the child,
or petition the child.
Do
you think that we will encounter any problems, if we were to claim the
child as our own, and bring the child to the U.S.?
SA
Dear SA:
I
would strongly advise against bringing the child to the U.S. in the
manner you suggest. The Embassy and the Philippine authorities
refer to this type of wrongful conduct as "adoption fraud".
Typically, this fraud involves a married couple falsely claiming a “given”
child as theirs, (through a supposed birth) and applying for a U.S.
passport for the child, or filing a petition for the child as their
own “immediate relative”.
The
U.S. Embassy is well aware of how people attempt to engage in such fraud.
The Foreign Affairs Manual (which is a manual containing guidance
for the Embassy), lists various types of suspicious activity, which
may indicate “adoption fraud”, and the steps the Consuls
should take in order to determine whether or not the child is the couple’s
natural child.
If
a man claims a child is his natural child, but the circumstances surrounding
the birth of the child are suspicious, the Embassy may decide to dig
deeper, and investigate whether or not the supposed father had access
or physical contact with the mother at or about the time of the conception.
For example, if a child was born in a particular month, the Embassy
would want to make sure that the father and mother were together nine
months earlier. If the documentation shows that the father
was in the U.S., and the mother was in the Philippines during the time
of the supposed conception, then how could he be the father of the child?
If
a woman claims to be the mother, some of the warning signs of adoption
fraud are:
5. The
alleged mother claims the child was born prematurely.
There
are many more “warning signs” of adoption fraud, and if any of these
warning signs are present, the Embassy will undoubtedly investigate
further, including interviewing neighbors. The Embassy may even
suggest that the couple undergo DNA testing, in which case the results
must be at least a 99% "match", in order for paternity
or maternity to be established.
If
anyone wants to bring in a child, I suggest that they seek the advice
of a reputable Attorney, and do it the legal way, by adopting the child
through court action before the child’s 16th birthday.
There
are two ways to adopt:
- Petition the child
as an orphan (if the parents are dead, have abandoned the child,
or the natural mother is in capable of providing proper care and support),
- Petition the child
as an adopted child (by having two years of legal and physical
custody).
Also,
the natural parents should not be raising the child you adopted.
Even if you satisfy the requirements of adoption, the case could still
be denied if the natural parent(s) continue exercise “primary parental
control” over the child. If you are going to adopt, you need
to follow and comply with the rules, and not try to find ways around
them.
Under
no circumstance should anyone engage in adoption fraud. It is
wrong and illegal.
|